Submissions against euthanasia shatter assumptions

 

Media release – 5 May 2017

 

77% of submissions to Parliament’s Health Select Committee are opposed to changing the law on assisted suicide and euthanasia, an analysis found.

(Click here for a printable infographic that contains a summary of the findings.)

Update: The Committee concluded in their report that 80% of submissions are opposed to euthanasia and ‘assisted dying’.

 

“The Voluntary Euthanasia Society touted that ‘the Health Select Committee received a record 21,533 submissions on the issue, indicating intense public interest in a potential law change’, says Renée Joubert, executive officer of Euthanasia-Free NZ. “By their own logic, the results of this analysis demonstrate an overwhelming opposition to a law change.”

“When New Zealanders are given the opportunity to engage with the issue, as opposed to merely responding to a single poll question, most support the current legislation. This is certainly our experience when interacting with people all over the country.

“The public are understandably concerned that the legalisation of assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia poses risks to vulnerable people, which is why advocates propose safeguards. However, these safeguards are unenforceable in practice.

“Polls often elicit a knee-jerk reaction, especially when the questions are emotive or leading, such as referring to a painful condition. In reality nowadays, terminally ill Kiwis do not need to die in pain. A poll question about euthanasia for pain is inappropriate.

“As the authors of the January 2017 NZMJ study admitted, “the item in our study included the terms ‘painful’, ‘incurable disease’ and ‘request’, which may have influenced participants to express increased support for euthanasia’.”

The Care Alliance analysed 21,277 submissions, excluding duplicates and a small number that could not be coded. An independent research company reviewed a sample of the coded submissions and concluded “with at least 95% confidence that the overall classification percentages are accurate within no more than 0.4% variation”.

 

The results of the full analysis shatter assumptions about public attitudes to voluntary euthanasia and assisted suicide.

A pictograph showing that 77 per cent of submissions on assisted suicide and euthanasia are opposed to changing the law.

 

The analysis shatters the assumption that the high number of submissions demonstrates overwhelming support for a law change.

In reality 77.1 % of submissions (16,411) were opposed to a law change, 19.5 % (4,142) were in favour, and 3.4 % (724) were neutral or unclear on this issue.

A common assumption is that support of legalisation is secular and opposition to legalisation is based on religious beliefs.

63.6 % of submissions (13,539) oppose a law change and also make no reference to religion. Only 18.5% of submissions (3,934) support a law change and also make no reference to religion.

There are religiously motivated people on both sides of the debate. 14.8 % of submissions included religious arguments. The majority of these (13.5% of the total) oppose a law change, and 208 submissions (0.93% of the total) support a law change.

Graphs showing that most submissions opposing 'assisted dying' make no reference to religion. There are more non-religious submissions opposing a law change than non-religious submissions supporting a law change. Both sides of the debate have advocates who are religiously motivated. However, only 7 submissions support assisted suicide and euthanasia based on religious arguments, while 1,337 oppose these based on religious arguments.
A graph showing that all submission length categories consist of mostly submissions opposing the legalisation of euthanasia and assisted suicide.

 

Some advocates assumed that submissions opposing a law change are mostly one-liners.

About 44% of submissions in opposition are between two lines and a page. Even if submissions of a certain length were to be discounted, the submissions opposing a law change would still outnumber those supporting a law change in other length categories.

The Health Select Committee conducted an investigation into ending one’s life in New Zealand, in response to a petition by former MP Hon Maryan Street and 8,974 others in June 2015 requesting Parliament to “investigate fully public attitudes towards the introduction of legislation which would permit medically-assisted dying in the event of a terminal illness or an irreversible condition which makes life unbearable”.

After extensive media coverage about the investigation, especially during January 2016, the Committee processed 21,435 written submissions, a record number of unique submissions received on any issue to date. These, and subsequent supplementary submissions, are published on Parliament’s website.

In August 2016 Dr Jane Silloway Smith analysed a random sample of these submissions and found that 78% were opposed to changing the law while 22% were in favour. The 16000voices.org.nz campaign was launched to highlight some submissions in video and written form.

ENDS

A record number of unique submissions were received on 'assisted dying': More than a New Zealand select committee has ever received on any other issue. 21,435 submissions on 'assisted dying' were processed and 21,277 were analysed, after removing duplicates and uncodables. Some submissions opposing a law change are featured on a website www.16000voices.org.nz

Pin It on Pinterest